What does international relations theory tell us about territorial disputes and their resolution?

Jong Kun Choi, Yong-Soo Eun

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This article explores the conditions under which territorial disputes are likely to lead to major armed conflicts and considers mechanisms through which territorial disputes can be resolved. In doing so, it attempts to discover the insights and suggestions that the competing major IR theories, namely neorealism, neoliberalism, and conventional constructivism, can offer. Several pathways through which to address territorial disputes are provided from the perspectives of these IR theories. In addition, the article discusses how each pathway can be employed in practice in addressing territorial disputes. In conclusion, we point out the complex and multifaceted nature of disputes over territory, arguing that their resolution calls for a synthetic interactive approach based on a combination of the values of two IR theories, liberalism and constructivism.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)141-159
Number of pages19
JournalInternational Politics
Volume55
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 2018 Mar 1

Fingerprint

territorial dispute
international relations
constructivism
neorealism
liberalism
neoliberalism
Values

Keywords

  • International relations (IRs)
  • IR theory
  • Territorial disputes
  • Theory and practice

Cite this

@article{d0ec5a7285374598aae6b2518272f354,
title = "What does international relations theory tell us about territorial disputes and their resolution?",
abstract = "This article explores the conditions under which territorial disputes are likely to lead to major armed conflicts and considers mechanisms through which territorial disputes can be resolved. In doing so, it attempts to discover the insights and suggestions that the competing major IR theories, namely neorealism, neoliberalism, and conventional constructivism, can offer. Several pathways through which to address territorial disputes are provided from the perspectives of these IR theories. In addition, the article discusses how each pathway can be employed in practice in addressing territorial disputes. In conclusion, we point out the complex and multifaceted nature of disputes over territory, arguing that their resolution calls for a synthetic interactive approach based on a combination of the values of two IR theories, liberalism and constructivism.",
keywords = "International relations (IRs), IR theory, Territorial disputes, Theory and practice",
author = "Choi, {Jong Kun} and Yong-Soo Eun",
year = "2018",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1057/s41311-017-0074-4",
language = "English",
volume = "55",
pages = "141--159",
journal = "International Politics",
issn = "1384-5748",
number = "2",

}

What does international relations theory tell us about territorial disputes and their resolution? / Choi, Jong Kun; Eun, Yong-Soo.

In: International Politics, Vol. 55, No. 2, 01.03.2018, p. 141-159.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - What does international relations theory tell us about territorial disputes and their resolution?

AU - Choi, Jong Kun

AU - Eun, Yong-Soo

PY - 2018/3/1

Y1 - 2018/3/1

N2 - This article explores the conditions under which territorial disputes are likely to lead to major armed conflicts and considers mechanisms through which territorial disputes can be resolved. In doing so, it attempts to discover the insights and suggestions that the competing major IR theories, namely neorealism, neoliberalism, and conventional constructivism, can offer. Several pathways through which to address territorial disputes are provided from the perspectives of these IR theories. In addition, the article discusses how each pathway can be employed in practice in addressing territorial disputes. In conclusion, we point out the complex and multifaceted nature of disputes over territory, arguing that their resolution calls for a synthetic interactive approach based on a combination of the values of two IR theories, liberalism and constructivism.

AB - This article explores the conditions under which territorial disputes are likely to lead to major armed conflicts and considers mechanisms through which territorial disputes can be resolved. In doing so, it attempts to discover the insights and suggestions that the competing major IR theories, namely neorealism, neoliberalism, and conventional constructivism, can offer. Several pathways through which to address territorial disputes are provided from the perspectives of these IR theories. In addition, the article discusses how each pathway can be employed in practice in addressing territorial disputes. In conclusion, we point out the complex and multifaceted nature of disputes over territory, arguing that their resolution calls for a synthetic interactive approach based on a combination of the values of two IR theories, liberalism and constructivism.

KW - International relations (IRs)

KW - IR theory

KW - Territorial disputes

KW - Theory and practice

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85030309838&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1057/s41311-017-0074-4

DO - 10.1057/s41311-017-0074-4

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85030309838

VL - 55

SP - 141

EP - 159

JO - International Politics

JF - International Politics

SN - 1384-5748

IS - 2

ER -