Relating factors to wearing personal radiation protectors among healthcare professionals

Yunjeong Heo, Hosun Chun, Seonghoon Kang, Wonjin Lee, Tae-Won Jang, Jongtae Park

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: With increasing use of medical radiologic procedures, wearing proper protector should be emphasized to reduce occupational radiation exposures. This research describes the rates of lead apron wearing for radiation protection and assessed occupational factors related to wearing rates for various types of healthcare professionals. Methods: We conducted a self-administered questionnaire survey through a website, on-site visits, fax, and mail. Of the 13,489 participants, 8858 workers who could not completely separate themselves from radiological procedure areas. Their general characteristics (sex and age), work history (job title, duration of employment, and hospital type), and practices (frequency of radiation procedures, ability to completely separate from radiation, and frequency of wearing protective lead aprons) were examined. Results: The mean rate of lead apron wearing during radiologic procedures was 48.0 %. The rate was different according to sex (male: 52.9 %, female: 39.6 %), hospital type (general hospital: 63.0 %, hospital: 51.3 %, clinic: 35. 6 %, dental hospital/clinic: 13.3 %, public health center: 22.8 %), and job title (radiologic technologist: 50.3 %, doctor: 70.3 %, dentist/dental hygienist: 15.0 %, nurse/nursing assistant: 64.5 %) (p < 0.001). By logistic regression analysis stratified by job title, use of lead aprons by radiologic technologists and nurses/nursing assistants was associated with hospital type and exposure frequency score. For doctors, apron wearing was associated with employment duration. For dentists/dental hygienists, apron wearing was associated with the exposure frequency score. Conclusions: To improve working environments for healthcare professionals exposed to radiation, it is necessary to consider related factors, such as job title, duration of employment, and hospital type, when utilizing a planning and management system to prevent radiation-related health problems.

Original languageEnglish
Article number60
JournalAnnals of Occupational and Environmental Medicine
Volume28
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 2016 Jan 1

Fingerprint

Radiation
Delivery of Health Care
Dental Hygienists
Dentists
Nursing
Telefacsimile
Nurses
Dental Clinics
Radiation Protection
Postal Service
Occupational Exposure
Sex Characteristics
General Hospitals
Public Health
Logistic Models
Regression Analysis
Health
Research
Lead

Keywords

  • Healthcare professionals
  • Personal radiation protectors
  • Preventive measures

Cite this

Heo, Yunjeong ; Chun, Hosun ; Kang, Seonghoon ; Lee, Wonjin ; Jang, Tae-Won ; Park, Jongtae. / Relating factors to wearing personal radiation protectors among healthcare professionals. In: Annals of Occupational and Environmental Medicine. 2016 ; Vol. 28, No. 1.
@article{512e755ea3ec4a10abb7c01b891c3e4f,
title = "Relating factors to wearing personal radiation protectors among healthcare professionals",
abstract = "Background: With increasing use of medical radiologic procedures, wearing proper protector should be emphasized to reduce occupational radiation exposures. This research describes the rates of lead apron wearing for radiation protection and assessed occupational factors related to wearing rates for various types of healthcare professionals. Methods: We conducted a self-administered questionnaire survey through a website, on-site visits, fax, and mail. Of the 13,489 participants, 8858 workers who could not completely separate themselves from radiological procedure areas. Their general characteristics (sex and age), work history (job title, duration of employment, and hospital type), and practices (frequency of radiation procedures, ability to completely separate from radiation, and frequency of wearing protective lead aprons) were examined. Results: The mean rate of lead apron wearing during radiologic procedures was 48.0 {\%}. The rate was different according to sex (male: 52.9 {\%}, female: 39.6 {\%}), hospital type (general hospital: 63.0 {\%}, hospital: 51.3 {\%}, clinic: 35. 6 {\%}, dental hospital/clinic: 13.3 {\%}, public health center: 22.8 {\%}), and job title (radiologic technologist: 50.3 {\%}, doctor: 70.3 {\%}, dentist/dental hygienist: 15.0 {\%}, nurse/nursing assistant: 64.5 {\%}) (p < 0.001). By logistic regression analysis stratified by job title, use of lead aprons by radiologic technologists and nurses/nursing assistants was associated with hospital type and exposure frequency score. For doctors, apron wearing was associated with employment duration. For dentists/dental hygienists, apron wearing was associated with the exposure frequency score. Conclusions: To improve working environments for healthcare professionals exposed to radiation, it is necessary to consider related factors, such as job title, duration of employment, and hospital type, when utilizing a planning and management system to prevent radiation-related health problems.",
keywords = "Healthcare professionals, Personal radiation protectors, Preventive measures",
author = "Yunjeong Heo and Hosun Chun and Seonghoon Kang and Wonjin Lee and Tae-Won Jang and Jongtae Park",
year = "2016",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1186/s40557-016-0144-x",
language = "English",
volume = "28",
journal = "Annals of Occupational and Environmental Medicine",
issn = "2052-4374",
number = "1",

}

Relating factors to wearing personal radiation protectors among healthcare professionals. / Heo, Yunjeong; Chun, Hosun; Kang, Seonghoon; Lee, Wonjin; Jang, Tae-Won; Park, Jongtae.

In: Annals of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Vol. 28, No. 1, 60, 01.01.2016.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Relating factors to wearing personal radiation protectors among healthcare professionals

AU - Heo, Yunjeong

AU - Chun, Hosun

AU - Kang, Seonghoon

AU - Lee, Wonjin

AU - Jang, Tae-Won

AU - Park, Jongtae

PY - 2016/1/1

Y1 - 2016/1/1

N2 - Background: With increasing use of medical radiologic procedures, wearing proper protector should be emphasized to reduce occupational radiation exposures. This research describes the rates of lead apron wearing for radiation protection and assessed occupational factors related to wearing rates for various types of healthcare professionals. Methods: We conducted a self-administered questionnaire survey through a website, on-site visits, fax, and mail. Of the 13,489 participants, 8858 workers who could not completely separate themselves from radiological procedure areas. Their general characteristics (sex and age), work history (job title, duration of employment, and hospital type), and practices (frequency of radiation procedures, ability to completely separate from radiation, and frequency of wearing protective lead aprons) were examined. Results: The mean rate of lead apron wearing during radiologic procedures was 48.0 %. The rate was different according to sex (male: 52.9 %, female: 39.6 %), hospital type (general hospital: 63.0 %, hospital: 51.3 %, clinic: 35. 6 %, dental hospital/clinic: 13.3 %, public health center: 22.8 %), and job title (radiologic technologist: 50.3 %, doctor: 70.3 %, dentist/dental hygienist: 15.0 %, nurse/nursing assistant: 64.5 %) (p < 0.001). By logistic regression analysis stratified by job title, use of lead aprons by radiologic technologists and nurses/nursing assistants was associated with hospital type and exposure frequency score. For doctors, apron wearing was associated with employment duration. For dentists/dental hygienists, apron wearing was associated with the exposure frequency score. Conclusions: To improve working environments for healthcare professionals exposed to radiation, it is necessary to consider related factors, such as job title, duration of employment, and hospital type, when utilizing a planning and management system to prevent radiation-related health problems.

AB - Background: With increasing use of medical radiologic procedures, wearing proper protector should be emphasized to reduce occupational radiation exposures. This research describes the rates of lead apron wearing for radiation protection and assessed occupational factors related to wearing rates for various types of healthcare professionals. Methods: We conducted a self-administered questionnaire survey through a website, on-site visits, fax, and mail. Of the 13,489 participants, 8858 workers who could not completely separate themselves from radiological procedure areas. Their general characteristics (sex and age), work history (job title, duration of employment, and hospital type), and practices (frequency of radiation procedures, ability to completely separate from radiation, and frequency of wearing protective lead aprons) were examined. Results: The mean rate of lead apron wearing during radiologic procedures was 48.0 %. The rate was different according to sex (male: 52.9 %, female: 39.6 %), hospital type (general hospital: 63.0 %, hospital: 51.3 %, clinic: 35. 6 %, dental hospital/clinic: 13.3 %, public health center: 22.8 %), and job title (radiologic technologist: 50.3 %, doctor: 70.3 %, dentist/dental hygienist: 15.0 %, nurse/nursing assistant: 64.5 %) (p < 0.001). By logistic regression analysis stratified by job title, use of lead aprons by radiologic technologists and nurses/nursing assistants was associated with hospital type and exposure frequency score. For doctors, apron wearing was associated with employment duration. For dentists/dental hygienists, apron wearing was associated with the exposure frequency score. Conclusions: To improve working environments for healthcare professionals exposed to radiation, it is necessary to consider related factors, such as job title, duration of employment, and hospital type, when utilizing a planning and management system to prevent radiation-related health problems.

KW - Healthcare professionals

KW - Personal radiation protectors

KW - Preventive measures

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84996497353&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1186/s40557-016-0144-x

DO - 10.1186/s40557-016-0144-x

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84996497353

VL - 28

JO - Annals of Occupational and Environmental Medicine

JF - Annals of Occupational and Environmental Medicine

SN - 2052-4374

IS - 1

M1 - 60

ER -