Imprinting perspective on the sustainability of commitments to competing institutional logics of social enterprises

Tae Jun Bae, James O. Fiet

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

This study examines the conditions under which dual commitments to competing institutional logics, particularly a social vs. a commercial logic, are both important to organizational func-tioning for social enterprises. Using hand-collected data from a survey of 190 social enterprises in South Korea, we identify a reliable measure for the sustainability of competing logics. We also identify the factors associated with variation in a social enterprise’s capacity to sustain dual commitments to competing institutional logics. Using an imprinting perspective, we show that a social en-trepreneur’s non-profit experience has a curvilinear effect on the sustainability of competing logics. Moreover, the non-linear effect of a social entrepreneur’s non-profit experience on the sustainability of competing logics is less profound in social enterprises with a highly ambivalent founder.

Original languageEnglish
Article number2014
Pages (from-to)1-27
Number of pages27
JournalSustainability (Switzerland)
Volume13
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - 2021 Feb 2

Keywords

  • Ambivalent interpretation
  • Competing institutional logics
  • Imprinting perspective
  • Nonprofit experience
  • Social entrepreneurship

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Imprinting perspective on the sustainability of commitments to competing institutional logics of social enterprises'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this