Corrigendum to “A three-phase copper MOF-graphene-polyaniline composite for effective sensing of ammonia” (Analytica Chimica Acta (2018) 1043 (89–97), (S0003267018310614) (10.1016/j.aca.2018.09.003))

Sanjeev K. Bhardwaj, Girish C. Mohanta, Amit L. Sharma, Ki-Hyun Kim, Akash Deep

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debateResearch

Abstract

In the original article published in last year's December issue, Volume 1043, the Graphical Abstract (GA) was accidentally replaced by one other figure from manuscipt. Further, in the final revison, it was not properly replaced accidentally. Readers may refer to the fact that the wrong old GA (shown below as Fig. 1) should be replaced with the proper GA (shown below as Fig. 2). [Figure presented] In addition, there are a few other corrections that need the attention. [1] Page 91, Line 3 (Right Column), “Sensitivity” should be replaced by “Response”. [2] Page 91, Equation 2: ΔR = Ri. Here, i should be subscrpited, if possible, as ΔR = R i . [3] Page 93, Equation 3: SiO2CuOF - graphene -Pani + + NH 3 → The earlier part of equation should be subscrpited as SiO 2 CuOF - graphene -Pani + + NH 3 . [4] Page 94, information regarding Fig. 8 is not correct. The legend for Fig. 8 on y-axis should be “Response” instead of sensitivity. The replacement (corrected) of Fig 8 for the original article is also provided below as Fig. 4. [Figure presented] All authors apologize these mistakes. These errors are nonetheless not important enough to change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. It is requested to ammend the suggested changes in the article.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)169-170
Number of pages2
JournalAnalytica Chimica Acta
Volume1061
DOIs
StatePublished - 2019 Jul 11

Fingerprint

Graphite
Ammonia
Copper
ammonia
copper
Composite materials
replacement
polyaniline
corrigendum

Cite this

@article{c55ba2df3c974747b2ba508f3836d451,
title = "Corrigendum to “A three-phase copper MOF-graphene-polyaniline composite for effective sensing of ammonia” (Analytica Chimica Acta (2018) 1043 (89–97), (S0003267018310614) (10.1016/j.aca.2018.09.003))",
abstract = "In the original article published in last year's December issue, Volume 1043, the Graphical Abstract (GA) was accidentally replaced by one other figure from manuscipt. Further, in the final revison, it was not properly replaced accidentally. Readers may refer to the fact that the wrong old GA (shown below as Fig. 1) should be replaced with the proper GA (shown below as Fig. 2). [Figure presented] In addition, there are a few other corrections that need the attention. [1] Page 91, Line 3 (Right Column), “Sensitivity” should be replaced by “Response”. [2] Page 91, Equation 2: ΔR = Ri. Here, i should be subscrpited, if possible, as ΔR = R i . [3] Page 93, Equation 3: SiO2CuOF - graphene -Pani + + NH 3 → The earlier part of equation should be subscrpited as SiO 2 CuOF - graphene -Pani + + NH 3 . [4] Page 94, information regarding Fig. 8 is not correct. The legend for Fig. 8 on y-axis should be “Response” instead of sensitivity. The replacement (corrected) of Fig 8 for the original article is also provided below as Fig. 4. [Figure presented] All authors apologize these mistakes. These errors are nonetheless not important enough to change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. It is requested to ammend the suggested changes in the article.",
author = "Bhardwaj, {Sanjeev K.} and Mohanta, {Girish C.} and Sharma, {Amit L.} and Ki-Hyun Kim and Akash Deep",
year = "2019",
month = "7",
day = "11",
doi = "10.1016/j.aca.2019.03.010",
language = "English",
volume = "1061",
pages = "169--170",
journal = "Analytica Chimica Acta",
issn = "0003-2670",

}

Corrigendum to “A three-phase copper MOF-graphene-polyaniline composite for effective sensing of ammonia” (Analytica Chimica Acta (2018) 1043 (89–97), (S0003267018310614) (10.1016/j.aca.2018.09.003)). / Bhardwaj, Sanjeev K.; Mohanta, Girish C.; Sharma, Amit L.; Kim, Ki-Hyun; Deep, Akash.

In: Analytica Chimica Acta, Vol. 1061, 11.07.2019, p. 169-170.

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debateResearch

TY - JOUR

T1 - Corrigendum to “A three-phase copper MOF-graphene-polyaniline composite for effective sensing of ammonia” (Analytica Chimica Acta (2018) 1043 (89–97), (S0003267018310614) (10.1016/j.aca.2018.09.003))

AU - Bhardwaj, Sanjeev K.

AU - Mohanta, Girish C.

AU - Sharma, Amit L.

AU - Kim, Ki-Hyun

AU - Deep, Akash

PY - 2019/7/11

Y1 - 2019/7/11

N2 - In the original article published in last year's December issue, Volume 1043, the Graphical Abstract (GA) was accidentally replaced by one other figure from manuscipt. Further, in the final revison, it was not properly replaced accidentally. Readers may refer to the fact that the wrong old GA (shown below as Fig. 1) should be replaced with the proper GA (shown below as Fig. 2). [Figure presented] In addition, there are a few other corrections that need the attention. [1] Page 91, Line 3 (Right Column), “Sensitivity” should be replaced by “Response”. [2] Page 91, Equation 2: ΔR = Ri. Here, i should be subscrpited, if possible, as ΔR = R i . [3] Page 93, Equation 3: SiO2CuOF - graphene -Pani + + NH 3 → The earlier part of equation should be subscrpited as SiO 2 CuOF - graphene -Pani + + NH 3 . [4] Page 94, information regarding Fig. 8 is not correct. The legend for Fig. 8 on y-axis should be “Response” instead of sensitivity. The replacement (corrected) of Fig 8 for the original article is also provided below as Fig. 4. [Figure presented] All authors apologize these mistakes. These errors are nonetheless not important enough to change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. It is requested to ammend the suggested changes in the article.

AB - In the original article published in last year's December issue, Volume 1043, the Graphical Abstract (GA) was accidentally replaced by one other figure from manuscipt. Further, in the final revison, it was not properly replaced accidentally. Readers may refer to the fact that the wrong old GA (shown below as Fig. 1) should be replaced with the proper GA (shown below as Fig. 2). [Figure presented] In addition, there are a few other corrections that need the attention. [1] Page 91, Line 3 (Right Column), “Sensitivity” should be replaced by “Response”. [2] Page 91, Equation 2: ΔR = Ri. Here, i should be subscrpited, if possible, as ΔR = R i . [3] Page 93, Equation 3: SiO2CuOF - graphene -Pani + + NH 3 → The earlier part of equation should be subscrpited as SiO 2 CuOF - graphene -Pani + + NH 3 . [4] Page 94, information regarding Fig. 8 is not correct. The legend for Fig. 8 on y-axis should be “Response” instead of sensitivity. The replacement (corrected) of Fig 8 for the original article is also provided below as Fig. 4. [Figure presented] All authors apologize these mistakes. These errors are nonetheless not important enough to change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. It is requested to ammend the suggested changes in the article.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85063014053&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.aca.2019.03.010

DO - 10.1016/j.aca.2019.03.010

M3 - Comment/debate

VL - 1061

SP - 169

EP - 170

JO - Analytica Chimica Acta

JF - Analytica Chimica Acta

SN - 0003-2670

ER -