Comparison of open and robotic surgery in radical prostatectomy: A single surgeon's experience

Won Sik Ham, Sung Yul Park, Kang Su Cho, Jin Sun Lee, Young Deuk Choi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: To compare the results of open radical prostatectomy (OP) and robotic prostatectomy (RP) for a single surgeon's experience of 219 radical prostatectomy cases. Materials and Methods: Between June 2002 and June 2007, 133 patients underwent OP and between July 2005 and June 2007, 86 patients underwent RP. To compare the surgeon's experience-related differences, we divided the OP cases into 73 early cases (OP-I) and 60 late cases (OP-II), and the RP cases into 30 early cases (RP-I) and 56 late cases (RP-II). The clinical characteristics, perioperative results, and early clinical outcomes were evaluated. Results: There were no significant differences in the preoperative characteristics between the four groups. For the RP cases, the mean estimated blood loss was decreased, a normal diet was started earlier, the mean duration of hospital stay and the mean duration of bladder catheterization was shorter than for the OP cases. The frequency of intraoperative complications significantly decreased in the RP-II group as compared to the RP-I group. Although there was no significant statistical difference in the positive surgical margin rates between the four groups, the rates were slightly decreased in the RP-II group. The recovery period of continence was shorter in the RP-II group than in the OP group and for patients 60 years or older, recovery of potency was also better in the RP-II group than the OP group. Conclusions: Our results suggest that RP at the hands of an experienced surgeon may decrease the positive surgical margin rate to some degree. Additionally, performance of RP may lead to a shorter duration of bladder catheterization and hospital stay and a better recovery of continence and potency than obtainable by OP.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)221-226
Number of pages6
JournalKorean Journal of Urology
Volume49
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 2008 Jan 1

Fingerprint

Robotics
Prostatectomy
Surgeons
Catheterization
Length of Stay
Urinary Bladder

Keywords

  • Open radical prostatectomy
  • Prostatic neoplasms
  • Robotic radical prostatectomy

Cite this

Ham, Won Sik ; Park, Sung Yul ; Cho, Kang Su ; Lee, Jin Sun ; Choi, Young Deuk. / Comparison of open and robotic surgery in radical prostatectomy : A single surgeon's experience. In: Korean Journal of Urology. 2008 ; Vol. 49, No. 3. pp. 221-226.
@article{5bfce5e56c2f46dc8de88281518762df,
title = "Comparison of open and robotic surgery in radical prostatectomy: A single surgeon's experience",
abstract = "Purpose: To compare the results of open radical prostatectomy (OP) and robotic prostatectomy (RP) for a single surgeon's experience of 219 radical prostatectomy cases. Materials and Methods: Between June 2002 and June 2007, 133 patients underwent OP and between July 2005 and June 2007, 86 patients underwent RP. To compare the surgeon's experience-related differences, we divided the OP cases into 73 early cases (OP-I) and 60 late cases (OP-II), and the RP cases into 30 early cases (RP-I) and 56 late cases (RP-II). The clinical characteristics, perioperative results, and early clinical outcomes were evaluated. Results: There were no significant differences in the preoperative characteristics between the four groups. For the RP cases, the mean estimated blood loss was decreased, a normal diet was started earlier, the mean duration of hospital stay and the mean duration of bladder catheterization was shorter than for the OP cases. The frequency of intraoperative complications significantly decreased in the RP-II group as compared to the RP-I group. Although there was no significant statistical difference in the positive surgical margin rates between the four groups, the rates were slightly decreased in the RP-II group. The recovery period of continence was shorter in the RP-II group than in the OP group and for patients 60 years or older, recovery of potency was also better in the RP-II group than the OP group. Conclusions: Our results suggest that RP at the hands of an experienced surgeon may decrease the positive surgical margin rate to some degree. Additionally, performance of RP may lead to a shorter duration of bladder catheterization and hospital stay and a better recovery of continence and potency than obtainable by OP.",
keywords = "Open radical prostatectomy, Prostatic neoplasms, Robotic radical prostatectomy",
author = "Ham, {Won Sik} and Park, {Sung Yul} and Cho, {Kang Su} and Lee, {Jin Sun} and Choi, {Young Deuk}",
year = "2008",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.4111/kju.2008.49.3.221",
language = "English",
volume = "49",
pages = "221--226",
journal = "Korean Journal of Urology",
issn = "2005-6737",
number = "3",

}

Comparison of open and robotic surgery in radical prostatectomy : A single surgeon's experience. / Ham, Won Sik; Park, Sung Yul; Cho, Kang Su; Lee, Jin Sun; Choi, Young Deuk.

In: Korean Journal of Urology, Vol. 49, No. 3, 01.01.2008, p. 221-226.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of open and robotic surgery in radical prostatectomy

T2 - A single surgeon's experience

AU - Ham, Won Sik

AU - Park, Sung Yul

AU - Cho, Kang Su

AU - Lee, Jin Sun

AU - Choi, Young Deuk

PY - 2008/1/1

Y1 - 2008/1/1

N2 - Purpose: To compare the results of open radical prostatectomy (OP) and robotic prostatectomy (RP) for a single surgeon's experience of 219 radical prostatectomy cases. Materials and Methods: Between June 2002 and June 2007, 133 patients underwent OP and between July 2005 and June 2007, 86 patients underwent RP. To compare the surgeon's experience-related differences, we divided the OP cases into 73 early cases (OP-I) and 60 late cases (OP-II), and the RP cases into 30 early cases (RP-I) and 56 late cases (RP-II). The clinical characteristics, perioperative results, and early clinical outcomes were evaluated. Results: There were no significant differences in the preoperative characteristics between the four groups. For the RP cases, the mean estimated blood loss was decreased, a normal diet was started earlier, the mean duration of hospital stay and the mean duration of bladder catheterization was shorter than for the OP cases. The frequency of intraoperative complications significantly decreased in the RP-II group as compared to the RP-I group. Although there was no significant statistical difference in the positive surgical margin rates between the four groups, the rates were slightly decreased in the RP-II group. The recovery period of continence was shorter in the RP-II group than in the OP group and for patients 60 years or older, recovery of potency was also better in the RP-II group than the OP group. Conclusions: Our results suggest that RP at the hands of an experienced surgeon may decrease the positive surgical margin rate to some degree. Additionally, performance of RP may lead to a shorter duration of bladder catheterization and hospital stay and a better recovery of continence and potency than obtainable by OP.

AB - Purpose: To compare the results of open radical prostatectomy (OP) and robotic prostatectomy (RP) for a single surgeon's experience of 219 radical prostatectomy cases. Materials and Methods: Between June 2002 and June 2007, 133 patients underwent OP and between July 2005 and June 2007, 86 patients underwent RP. To compare the surgeon's experience-related differences, we divided the OP cases into 73 early cases (OP-I) and 60 late cases (OP-II), and the RP cases into 30 early cases (RP-I) and 56 late cases (RP-II). The clinical characteristics, perioperative results, and early clinical outcomes were evaluated. Results: There were no significant differences in the preoperative characteristics between the four groups. For the RP cases, the mean estimated blood loss was decreased, a normal diet was started earlier, the mean duration of hospital stay and the mean duration of bladder catheterization was shorter than for the OP cases. The frequency of intraoperative complications significantly decreased in the RP-II group as compared to the RP-I group. Although there was no significant statistical difference in the positive surgical margin rates between the four groups, the rates were slightly decreased in the RP-II group. The recovery period of continence was shorter in the RP-II group than in the OP group and for patients 60 years or older, recovery of potency was also better in the RP-II group than the OP group. Conclusions: Our results suggest that RP at the hands of an experienced surgeon may decrease the positive surgical margin rate to some degree. Additionally, performance of RP may lead to a shorter duration of bladder catheterization and hospital stay and a better recovery of continence and potency than obtainable by OP.

KW - Open radical prostatectomy

KW - Prostatic neoplasms

KW - Robotic radical prostatectomy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=41549097301&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.4111/kju.2008.49.3.221

DO - 10.4111/kju.2008.49.3.221

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:41549097301

VL - 49

SP - 221

EP - 226

JO - Korean Journal of Urology

JF - Korean Journal of Urology

SN - 2005-6737

IS - 3

ER -